Skip to main content
Back

India's path to economic recovery

5 October, 2020 

Rana Gupta, Indian Equities Specialists
 

India has not been spared from the global damage caused by COVID-19 pandemic, with the country’s lockdown contributing to a precipitous drop-in economic activity. However, we believe that the worst is likely behind us, as growth is bottoming out, government policies remain supportive, and virus-related health metrics are stabilising. In this investment note, Rana Gupta and Koushik Pal, Indian Equities Specialists, explain that despite the setback, India should benefit from a path of economic normalisation in the short-term and an acceleration of existing structural drivers, such as formalisation and government reinvestment, over a longer time frame.   

 

Our consistent view on India, even before the COVID-19 outbreak, was that the economy faced a cyclical downturn driven by deceleration in the informal economy and credit slowdown among the non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) due to tighter monetary conditions.

While we had expected an economic recovery in the first half of 2020 on the back of policy support from the "Three R's"1, the pandemic and subsequent government lockdown stifled any upturn. Consequently, second-quarter GDP fell by approximately 24% year-on-year.

Despite this sharp dip in growth, GDP is a backwards-looking number, reflecting the damage of the strict lockdown implemented in India until June. Since then, the economy has gradually reopened, and many activities are normalising. In our view, the worst is likely behind us for three reasons:

  1. The adverse economic conditions have bottomed out.
  2. Monetary conditions remain benign due to supportive flows and supportive policies.
  3. A more stable COVID-19 situation.

These factors augur well for an ongoing rebound in activity and sequential improvement in economic data after the disruption experienced since March. While the upcoming recovery is expected to be uneven, we remain positive on India’s medium-term growth potential, given formalisation should continue to boost the digital economy, and the government's reinvest policies that should herald a revival in manufacturing.

  • Beyond the hyperbole: three macro takeaways from the 2024 US elections

    What investors and policy watchers should take away from the 2024 election results depends, in part, on time horizon.

    Read more
  • How might the US election and China’s stimulus package impact Asian fixed income?

    Asia Fixed Income Team analyses how the US election and other recent major events could impact the region’s fixed income markets.

    Read more
  • Assessing China’s latest stimulus measures

    Greater China Equities Team analyses the latest round of strategic stimulus and explains why it warrants more than short-term tactical attention. The team also highlights a case study of Chinese companies that are ‘going-global’ to showcase this interesting juncture in the country’s corporate development.

    Read more
See all

Growth has bottomed out, and will likely improve

We believe that GDP growth has bottomed out, and we should see sequential improvements going forward – in the fiscal year 20222, we expect double-digit growth in real GDP. However, the recovery will remain uneven across sectors and geographies. That said, with most urban centres now operating almost normally, our confidence in a resumption of activity has subsequently increased.

Many bottom-up indicators on the demand-and-supply side provide evidence for this thesis. Vehicle sales across all categories have improved (See Chart 1). In addition, a rise in bitumen consumption points to a pick-up in the construction sector, while positive rail-freight growth signifies that industrial activity has also started to normalise, albeit gradually (See Chart 2).

 

Monetary conditions are benign

Divergence in monetary conditions is the critical difference between the earlier cyclical slowdown and the post-pandemic recovery phase. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has aggressively cut rates by 115 basis points (bps) since March 2020. It has also provided the banks with additional LTRO and TLTRO liquidity (roughly 4.5% of GDP) at this lower policy rate and continued to intervene in the bond market to ensure that it functions smoothly4.

Domestic monetary conditions have also improved, as India's external account situation remains favourable: the capital and current accounts are in better health, with the country's balance of payments in surplus. From a current account perspective, this is primarily due to a rising share of net exports in electronics and chemicals, as well as falling crude oil prices. Robust inflows are driving the capital account recovery in foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio participation in India’s digital economy and manufacturing revival. As a result, India's foreign-exchange reserves increased from US$457 billion in December 2019 to US$541 billion by the end of August 20205.

Benign liquidity conditions are reflected in money- supply (M1) growth (See Chart 3) and lower rates on both the short and long end of the curve (See Chart 4). In fact, real rates are now in negative territory for the first time in five years.

 

While we expect credit costs to rise from these levels, they will not be debilitating for the banking sector due to lower rates and ample liquidity. An active and vigilant RBI is likely to prevent any systemic refinancing issues. Most major private banks have also raised capital recently, and their balance sheets are adequately capitalised.

Overall, we expect the credit-transmission mechanism to pick up. This will be driven by a gradual reopening of the economy, the containment of asset-quality deterioration, and the well-capitalised balance sheets of the large private-sector banks. There are also lower nominal rates and negative real rates.

Finally, we do not anticipate any substantial depreciation in the value of the rupee, as better capital flows will help to revive growth. In addition, we do not believe that the trade deficit will expand meaningfully, as the share of domestic manufacturing has improved and should continue to do so.

Confidence in an economic reopening is rising

Beyond the headlines about a high number of confirmed cases, there are a few positives to take away from the pandemic situation in India: case recoveries have notably increased over the past three months, while mortality rates have declined. This has brought the curve of active cases under control. Since July, these factors have combined to increase confidence among the government and the people to resume economic activity, even as cases continue to rise at a headline level.

Overall, despite rising infection numbers, we also sense that the COVID-19 situation is stabilising. Our base case does not foresee any further national lockdowns.

Economic formalisation and reinvestment should drive growth

Over the short-to-medium term, we retain an optimistic cyclical view based on the gradual reopening of the economy. From a mid-to-long-term perspective, we are positive on the structural economic changes being driven by the powerful themes of formalisation through the digital economy and reinvestment in manufacturing. If anything, the pandemic has accelerated these trends; companies across sectors — from consumer staples, retail, healthcare, media, BFSI and even automobile companies have launched innovative digital platforms to engage with customers and find new ways to catalyse revenue growth. These developments have the potential to feed off each other and create the kind of virtuous cycle (see Chart 5) we’ve seen in China and other East Asian economies.

On the one hand, economic formalisation is driving the growth of India’s massive digital economy. In turn, the digital economy is itself propelling the formalisation process by boosting productivity.

We also believe that manufacturing growth is at an inflection point, led by the government’s supportive reinvest policies (incentives and tax cuts for domestic production) and a conducive global environment that is looking for a supply base outside of China. We have already seen a significant amount of investment by international firms, and this structural trend should continue to attract global capital to realise its potential8.

As formalisation grows, government revenues should increase, which, in turn, will lead to higher spending on infrastructure. As manufacturing expands, the creation of more formal jobs will drive income growth and consumption, thereby unleashing a virtuous cycle. Together, these themes will serve as strong drivers over the medium term, notwithstanding the recent cyclical challenges.

So far, the fiscal stimulus measures announced in response to the pandemic have primarily focused on liquidity (roughly 4.5% of GDP) and credit-guarantee measures (approximately 2% of GDP)9. There has been less of direct fiscal impulse (about 1% of GDP)9. Fiscal measures have avoided a broad-based fiscal impulse and focused instead on the provision of basic foodstuffs and income to the most vulnerable sections of society. It is possible that the government may announce additional fiscal measures when the economy is operating at a higher utilisation level to ensure they have a better multiplier impact.

More importantly, the government has concentrated its policy efforts on catalysing a longer-term manufacturing revival and increasing import substitution. These range from additional duties on imports, investment-linked incentives, as well as long-needed simplification of labour laws to improve the ease of doing business in India and incentivise more domestic manufacturing that are in line with the government’s reinvest policies10. Recently, the aim is to boost domestic manufacturing in sectors such as chemicals, active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), mobile phones, and consumer durables.

Such moves should lead to an increase in fresh investment leading to a recovery in the capital-formation cycle, improvements in employment opportunities, and gains in net exports for India.

Our latest sector views

Based on these changes in the Indian economy, we have updated our sector views:

More constructive on:

  • Financials: We expect banking asset quality to remain under control, as large private banks have raised capital to strengthen their balance sheets, and the RBI has actively intervened in the market to prevent systemic issues. A positive outlook exists for financial services, as these benefit from higher spending through the formal channels, such as digital (e.g. credit cards), and a revival in car and housing sales (e.g. general insurance).
  • Consumer discretionary (auto, apparel and food services): As urban areas in India rebound economically, coupled with better results in the recently concluded earnings season, we saw many consumer-related companies show impressive cost control and a structural re-engineering of costs. As the recovery looms, many of these firms should operate with greater efficiency. We should also see auto companies do well as people prefer personal mobility over public transport to maintain safe distancing.
  • Materials: This is a play on both a resumption in industrial activity in India, through cement, as well as global recovery through metals.
  • IT Services: The sector continues to benefit from faster digital transformation initiatives, as companies across the globe are trying to reimagine their business models and processes in response to the pandemic.
  • Structural themes: We are still constructive on macro themes like import substitution plays benefitting from government policy of encouraging domestic manufacturing (Electronic Manufacturing Services, or EMS companies, auto ancillaries), as well as a diversification of production away from China due to the trade war (specialty chemicals and pharma).

Less constructive on:

  • Communications services and consumer staples where valuations have re-rated ahead of growth expectations, as they were seen to benefit from the lockdown.

The key risk to our view remains a second wave of infections in India, pushing up the active-case growth curve and new lockdowns.

 

Download full PDF

 

 

1 The Three R's are: "Recycle" (privatisation of state-owned enterprises), "Rebuild" (tax cut to corporates and middle-income household) and "Reinvest" (lower tax rate for investments on the ground).

2 The period from 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022.

3 CEIC, Kotak Institutional Equities, as of 12 September 2020. The April 2020 data for ppassenger vehicle and two-wheeler were not released by the "Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers".

4 Manulife Investment Management made the GDP estimate. The other analysis comes from the Reserve Bank of India, 31 August 2020.

5 Reserve Bank of India and Bloomberg, as of 31 August 2020.

6 Bloomberg, as of 28 August 2020.

7 Bloomberg, as of 15 September 2020.

8 TIMESNOWNEWS.COM: "$20 billion and counting! Investments attracted by India in 3 months during Covid-19", 16 July 2020.

9 Manulife Investment Management estimates, as of 21 September 2020.

10 The Economic times: "Labour reforms intend to put India among top 10 nations in ease of doing business", 22 September 2020.

  • Beyond the hyperbole: three macro takeaways from the 2024 US elections

    What investors and policy watchers should take away from the 2024 election results depends, in part, on time horizon.

    Read more
  • How might the US election and China’s stimulus package impact Asian fixed income?

    Asia Fixed Income Team analyses how the US election and other recent major events could impact the region’s fixed income markets.

    Read more
  • Assessing China’s latest stimulus measures

    Greater China Equities Team analyses the latest round of strategic stimulus and explains why it warrants more than short-term tactical attention. The team also highlights a case study of Chinese companies that are ‘going-global’ to showcase this interesting juncture in the country’s corporate development.

    Read more
See all