Skip to main content
Back

The Fed’s historic stimulus package

16 March, 2020

Frances Donald, Chief Economist
 

The Fed sent a jolt through the financial markets on Sunday, 15 March, by cutting interest rates by a full percentage point three days before its scheduled rate-setting meeting. While an imminent rate cut had been expected, the timing of the announcement was a surprise. The decision brings the US interest rate back to the level it was during much of the 2008 global financial crisis (0%–0.25%). Our Global Chief Economist and Global Head of Macroeconomic Strategy Frances Donald takes a closer look. 

We’ve written previously that we believe the US Federal Reserve (Fed) would have to move aggressively before its scheduled March 18 meeting; however, even we hadn’t expected this level of action. In our view, the US central bank has thrown just about every tool available at its disposal at the markets and the US economy.

It’s important to note that the package Fed Chair Jerome Powell announced on 15 March isn’t just about the interest-rate cut, it also includes:

  • A new quantitative easing (QE) program worth at least US$700 billion, with US$500 billion allocated to US Treasury purchases and US$200 billion allocated to mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Crucially, in a departure from the Fed’s previous normalisation plan, cash from MBS that have matured will now go back into MBS purchases rather than into Treasuries. This QE program starts on Monday, 16 March.1
  • Forward guidance returns. The Fed said in its statement that “the Committee  expects to maintain this target range until it is confident that the economy has weathered recent events and is on track to achieve its maximum employment and price stability goals.”1 This is consistent with our forecast that there will be no interest-rate hikes in the next five years. 
  • The Fed’s discount rate is cut by an extra 50 basis points (bps) to narrow the spread with the federal funds rate. Banks unable to meet their liquidity needs in the fed funds market will also be able to borrow from the Fed’s discount window for as long as 90 days and the Fed also said it will reduce reserve requirement ratios to 0%. 
  • Using foreign exchange swap lines established in 2008, the Fed and its partner central banks are mobilising existing arrangements to distribute US dollars globally on enhanced terms and with lower costs. Chair Powell noted this was also to prevent financial stresses abroad from permeating the US system.

Has the Fed gone too far? Why is it cutting rates and adding liquidity to this extent?

In our view, there’s absolutely a growth component here. It’s becoming increasingly clear that we’re staring down the barrel of an extremely pronounced growth shock—one that may be short in duration, but painful in terms of depth. There are many market commentators who say that rate cuts at this point won’t help growth. I respectfully disagree: They absolutely do, just not to the same degree they have in the past. Mortgage applications during the week ended 6 March rose 55% from the previous week, led by refinancing. This is evidence of lower rates at work. At the margin, it should also help the consumer by lowering some bills, which could translate into slightly higher disposable income.

The more important point here, however, is that what we’re dealing with could be bigger than a coronavirus-created recession—policymakers are acting to steer us away from a potential credit crunch. In our mind, the Fed is clearly trying to prevent a repeat of 2008 and keep us in a 2001 type of recession from which we can bounce back much more quickly. The US Treasury market has seen sizable funding issues in the past week and has been displaying signs of stress. As Chair Powell noted during the Fed’s press conference, the Treasury market is typically the most liquid, and any sign of stress is therefore concerning and could translate into broader market dysfunction. He also noted that he felt it was important that the Fed “support market functioning.”2

What’s next? Is the Fed “out of bullets”?

Of course not. The Fed may be out of rate cuts, but it’s not out of tools. We’re expecting more action from the Fed in the weeks ahead.

  • We expect the Fed to introduce a commercial paper backstop to support the corporate credit markets.
  • We expect target yield curve control, as the Bank of Japan has done. While it’s impossible to know if the Fed would choose to target the 10-year yield curve or another maturity, we believe it’s likely that it will try to engineer steepening of the yield curve.
  • It’s also possible that the Fed could seek approval from Congress to allow it to purchase credit and equities (also like the Bank of Japan). Although Chair Powell deflected this question in Sunday’s press conference, we don’t think it’s out of the scope of possibilities this year.
  • One measure that we don’t believe the Fed will pursue is negative interest rates. Or at least, not during this cycle. Chair Powell noted during Sunday’s press conference that “… we do not see negative policy rates as likely to be an appropriate policy response here in the United States.”2

Ultimately, we believe that the Fed’s package won’t be able to prevent a recession if that’s where the US economy is headed—and it probably is. However, this package will likely support credit channels and enable the healthy functioning of the US Treasury market, thereby preventing severe financial contagion from taking place. That said, overall visibility remains limited. Hopefully, the fog will clear soon.

 

1 Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement, federalreserve.gov, 15 March 2020.

2 “FOMC Press Conference Call,” 15 March 2020

  • Beyond the hyperbole: three macro takeaways from the 2024 US elections

    What investors and policy watchers should take away from the 2024 election results depends, in part, on time horizon.

    Read more
  • How might the US election and China’s stimulus package impact Asian fixed income?

    Asia Fixed Income Team analyses how the US election and other recent major events could impact the region’s fixed income markets.

    Read more
  • Assessing China’s latest stimulus measures

    Greater China Equities Team analyses the latest round of strategic stimulus and explains why it warrants more than short-term tactical attention. The team also highlights a case study of Chinese companies that are ‘going-global’ to showcase this interesting juncture in the country’s corporate development.

    Read more
See all
  • Beyond the hyperbole: three macro takeaways from the 2024 US elections

    What investors and policy watchers should take away from the 2024 election results depends, in part, on time horizon.

    Read more
  • How might the US election and China’s stimulus package impact Asian fixed income?

    Asia Fixed Income Team analyses how the US election and other recent major events could impact the region’s fixed income markets.

    Read more
  • Assessing China’s latest stimulus measures

    Greater China Equities Team analyses the latest round of strategic stimulus and explains why it warrants more than short-term tactical attention. The team also highlights a case study of Chinese companies that are ‘going-global’ to showcase this interesting juncture in the country’s corporate development.

    Read more
See all